Evaluation of Formulated Concentrate Feeds on Feed Intake and Milk Yield of Lactating Upgraded Dairy Cows at Nekemte and Ijaji Towns

Tesfaye Mediksa; Dereje Bekele; Tesfaye Marsha; Habtamu Abera

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of Formulated Concentrate Feeds on Feed Intake and Milk Yield of Lactating Upgraded Dairy Cows at Nekemte and Ijaji Towns

Tesfaye Mediksa, Dereje Bekele, Tesfaye Marsha, Habtamu Abera

Published in American Journal of Applied Scientific Research (Volume 7, Issue 2)

Received: 13 January 2021 Accepted: 16 April 2021 Published: 22 June 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

A study was carried out at urban and peri-urban areas of Nekemte and Ijaji towns to evaluate the effects of formulated concentrate feeds on feed intake and milk yield of upgraded dairy cows kept by smallholder dairy keepers. Twenty four lactating dairy cows within their 2^nd months after calving and with similar status were selected from smallholder dairy keepers under zero grazing system whereby feed intake, BCS and milk yield data were recorded for a period of 90 days. The cows were randomly allocated to four feeding groups (T1, T2, T3 and T4) in a completely randomized design (CRD). Cows in T1, T2, T3 and T4 were fed commercial dairy feed, recommended concentrate feed of ATRC, recommended concentrate feed of HARC and recommended concentrate feed of BARC, respectively. Basal diet for all dietary treatments were natural grass hay adlibtum. The average CP (%) and IVDMD % of the natural grass hay and recommended concentrates of BARC were (8.2, 7.95) and (25.88, 10.59), respectively. The daily concentrate DM) and CP intakes were significantly different (p<0.001) among the dietary treatments with highest values being registered for T4 (8.2 and 2.12 kg/d, respectively) and for T1 7.55 and 1.77kg/d respectively while the lowest values being registered for t T2 (6.28 and 1.3 kg/d, respectively) and for T3 (5.83 and 1.12 kg/d, respectively). The daily mean milk yields were higher (P<0.001) for cows in T4 (16.42 liter/day) and in T1 (15.10 liter/day) than those for those in T2 (12.55 liter/day) and in T3 (11.66 liter/day). Milk yield was also affected by location (P<0.001) with the highest milk yield being obtained at Nekemte town (15.15 liter/day) and the lowest at Ijaji town (11.49 liter/day). The largest change noted in variable costs was birr 120.79 per day and the change observed in net income was birr 361.24 per day, resulting in a marginal rate of return of 76.69% for T4. Among the concentrates recommended different research centers and the commercial concentrate, concentrate recommended at BARC and the commercial ones increased milk production and profitability of the dairy enterprise. Therefore, Feeding these concentrate types for upgraded lactating cows under smallholder dairy keepers is profitable both biologically and economically.

Published in	American Journal of Applied Scientific Research (Volume 7, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12
Page(s)	22-28
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Concentrate, Dairy, Feed Intake, Milk Yield

References

[1]	Abebaw Nega, 2007. Effects of supplementation with rice bran, noug seed (Guizotia abyssinica) cake and their mixtures on feed utilization and live weight change of farta sheep. An MSc Thesis Presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University. 92p.
[2]	Adugna T 2008. Feed resources and feeding management: A manual for feedlot operators and development workers. Ethiopia Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards and Livestock & Meat Marketing Program (SPS-LMM) USAID, Ethiopia. 38p.
[3]	Agricultural Research Council, 1990. The nutrient requirement of ruminant livestock. Common Wealth Agricultural Bureaux. Slough, England. UK.
[4]	AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists), 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. pp. 5-13. (16th edition), Washington DC, USA.
[5]	Azage T, Berhanu G, Hoekstra D, Berhanu B and Yoseph M 2013. Smallholder dairy production and marketing systems in Ethiopia: IPMS experiences and opportunities for market-oriented development. IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers Project Working Paper 31. Nairobi: Kenya. 65p.
[6]	Ba, N. X., Doyle, P. T., Van Hai, D., Lane, P. A., Malau-Aduli, A. E., Van, N. H. and Parsons, D., 2015. Effect of concentrate supplementation on nutrient digestibility and growth of Brahman crossbred cattle fed a basal diet of grass and rice straw. Journal of animal science and technology, 57 (1), p. 35.
[7]	Belay D, Yisehak K and Janssens G P J 2012. Productive and reproductive performance of Zebu X Holstein-Friesian crossbred dairy cows in Jimma Town, Oromia, Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria, 8 (1): 67-72.
[8]	CIMMYT, 1985. From Agronomic Data to Farmers Recommendations. Economics Programme. Mexico. 32p.
[9]	De Almeida Rufino, L. M., Detmann, E., Gomes, D. Í., dos Reis, W. L. S., Batista, E. D., de Campos Valadares Filho, S. and Paulino, M. F., 2016. Intake, digestibility and nitrogen utilization in cattle fed tropical forage and supplemented with protein in the rumen, abomasum, or both. Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 7 (1), p. 11.
[10]	Demski, J. B., Arcaro Junior, I., Gimenes, F. M. D. A., Toledo, L. M. D., Miranda, M. S. D., Giacomini, A. A. and Silva, G. A. D., 2019. Milk production and ingestive behavior of cows grazing on Marandu and Mulato II pastures under rotational stocking. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 48.
[11]	Diriba Geleti, Mekonnen Hailemariam, Ashenafi Mengistu & Adugna Tolera, 2013. Nutritive Value of Selected Browse and Herbaceous Forage Legumes Adapted to Medium Altitude Subhumid Areas of Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria, 11 (6): 809-816.
[12]	Falk, M., Münger, A., Zbinden, R. S., Gross, J. J., Bruckmaier, R. M., Hess, H. D. and Dohme-Meier, F., 2018. Effects of concentrate supplementation in early lactation on nutrient efficiency, ruminal fermentation and reticular pH of zero-grazing dairy cows with differing milk production potentials. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 102 (6), pp. 1497-1508.
[13]	Gillah K A, Kifaro G C and Madsen J 2012: Urban and peri urban dairy farming in East Africa: A review on production levels, constraints and opportunities. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 24, Article #198. Retrieved May 13, 2020, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/11/gill24198.htm.
[14]	Huhtanen, P., Nousiainen, J. I., Rinne, M., Kytölä, K. and Khalili, H., 2008. Utilization and partition of dietary nitrogen in dairy cows fed grass silage-based diets. Journal of dairy science, 91 (9), pp. 3589-3599.
[15]	Land O'Lakes, Inc2010 The next stage in dairy development for Ethiopia. USAID. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Pp. 20-32.
[16]	McDermott J J, Staal S J, Freeman H A, Herrero M and Van de Steeg J A2010 Sustaining intensification of smallholder livestock systems in the tropics. Livestock Science, 130: 95-109.
[17]	McDonald, P., Edwards. R. A, Greenhalgh. J. D and Morgan C. A, 2002. Animal Nutrition 6^th edition. Longman. United Kingdom. 607p.
[18]	Moyo, M. and Nsahlai, I. V., 2018. Rate of Passage of Digesta in Ruminants; Are Goats Different?. Goat science, IntechOpen, pp. 39-74.
[19]	NRC, 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC. USA.
[20]	SAS (Statistical Analysis S ystem), 2002. SAS InstituteInc, NC, USA.
[21]	Shah H, Sharif M, Majid A, Hayat U and Munawar A, 2009: From experimental data to farmer recommendation: an economic analysis of on-farm trial of UMMB feed for milking animals in rain-fed Pothwar, Pakistan. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 21 (117). Retrieved August 11, 2014, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/8/shah21117.htm.
[22]	Singhal, K K. D. D. Sharma and P. S. Oberoi, 1992. Comparative nutrient utilization of ammoniated paddy straw in cattel and buffaloes. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 9: 39-44.
[23]	Steinshamn. H, 2010. Effect of forage legumes on feed intake, milk production and milk quality a review. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 28 (3): 195-206.
[24]	Tilley, J. M. A. and R. A. Terry, 1963. Atwo-stagetechniquefo rin Vitro digestion of foragecrops. Journal of the British Grassl and Society, 18: 104.
[25]	Tulu, A., Khushi, Y. R. and Challi, D. G., 2018. Supplementary value of two Lablab purpureus cultivars and concentrate mixture to natural grass hay basal diet based on feed intake, digestibility, growth performance and net return of Horro sheep. Int J Livestock Prod, 9 (6), pp. 140-50.
[26]	Van Soest, P. J. Nutritional ecology of the Ruminant. Cornell University. O and B Books, Inc. USA, 1982.
[27]	Van Soest, P. J, 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, Comstock Publishing Associates. A division of Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.
[28]	Van Soest, P. J., 1965. Symposium of factors influencing the voluntary intake in relation to chemical composition and digestibility. Journal Animal Science, 24: 834p.
[29]	Wambui, C. C., S. A. Abdulrazak and Q. Noordin, 2006. The effect of supplementing urea treated maize stover with tithonia, calliandra and sesbania to growing goats. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 18 (5): 64.
[30]	Wanapat, M., Kang, S. and Polyorach, S., 2013. Development of feeding systems and strategies of supplementation to enhance rumen fermentation and ruminant production in the tropics. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 4 (1), p. 32.
[31]	Wildman et al., 1982. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics ME. E. Wildman, G. M. Jones, P. E. Wagner, R. L. Boman, H. F. Troutt Jr., T. N. Lesch.
[32]	Zelalem Y, Emmanuelle G B and Ameha S 2011 A review of the Ethiopian dairy sector. Rudolf Fombad (eds), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Sub-Regional Office for Eastern Africa (FAO/SFE), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 81p.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tesfaye Mediksa, Dereje Bekele, Tesfaye Marsha, Habtamu Abera. (2021). Evaluation of Formulated Concentrate Feeds on Feed Intake and Milk Yield of Lactating Upgraded Dairy Cows at Nekemte and Ijaji Towns. American Journal of Applied Scientific Research, 7(2), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tesfaye Mediksa; Dereje Bekele; Tesfaye Marsha; Habtamu Abera. Evaluation of Formulated Concentrate Feeds on Feed Intake and Milk Yield of Lactating Upgraded Dairy Cows at Nekemte and Ijaji Towns. Am. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2021, 7(2), 22-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tesfaye Mediksa, Dereje Bekele, Tesfaye Marsha, Habtamu Abera. Evaluation of Formulated Concentrate Feeds on Feed Intake and Milk Yield of Lactating Upgraded Dairy Cows at Nekemte and Ijaji Towns. Am J Appl Sci Res. 2021;7(2):22-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12,
  author = {Tesfaye Mediksa and Dereje Bekele and Tesfaye Marsha and Habtamu Abera},
  title = {Evaluation of Formulated Concentrate Feeds on Feed Intake and Milk Yield of Lactating Upgraded Dairy Cows at Nekemte and Ijaji Towns},
  journal = {American Journal of Applied Scientific Research},
  volume = {7},
  number = {2},
  pages = {22-28},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajasr.20210702.12},
  abstract = {A study was carried out at urban and peri-urban areas of Nekemte and Ijaji towns to evaluate the effects of formulated concentrate feeds on feed intake and milk yield of upgraded dairy cows kept by smallholder dairy keepers. Twenty four lactating dairy cows within their 2nd months after calving and with similar status were selected from smallholder dairy keepers under zero grazing system whereby feed intake, BCS and milk yield data were recorded for a period of 90 days. The cows were randomly allocated to four feeding groups (T1, T2, T3 and T4) in a completely randomized design (CRD). Cows in T1, T2, T3 and T4 were fed commercial dairy feed, recommended concentrate feed of ATRC, recommended concentrate feed of HARC and recommended concentrate feed of BARC, respectively. Basal diet for all dietary treatments were natural grass hay adlibtum. The average CP (%) and IVDMD % of the natural grass hay and recommended concentrates of BARC were (8.2, 7.95) and (25.88, 10.59), respectively. The daily concentrate DM) and CP intakes were significantly different (p<0.001) among the dietary treatments with highest values being registered for T4 (8.2 and 2.12 kg/d, respectively) and for T1 7.55 and 1.77kg/d respectively while the lowest values being registered for t T2 (6.28 and 1.3 kg/d, respectively) and for T3 (5.83 and 1.12 kg/d, respectively). The daily mean milk yields were higher (P<0.001) for cows in T4 (16.42 liter/day) and in T1 (15.10 liter/day) than those for those in T2 (12.55 liter/day) and in T3 (11.66 liter/day). Milk yield was also affected by location (P<0.001) with the highest milk yield being obtained at Nekemte town (15.15 liter/day) and the lowest at Ijaji town (11.49 liter/day). The largest change noted in variable costs was birr 120.79 per day and the change observed in net income was birr 361.24 per day, resulting in a marginal rate of return of 76.69% for T4. Among the concentrates recommended different research centers and the commercial concentrate, concentrate recommended at BARC and the commercial ones increased milk production and profitability of the dairy enterprise. Therefore, Feeding these concentrate types for upgraded lactating cows under smallholder dairy keepers is profitable both biologically and economically.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Evaluation of Formulated Concentrate Feeds on Feed Intake and Milk Yield of Lactating Upgraded Dairy Cows at Nekemte and Ijaji Towns
AU  - Tesfaye Mediksa
AU  - Dereje Bekele
AU  - Tesfaye Marsha
AU  - Habtamu Abera
Y1  - 2021/06/22
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12
T2  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
JF  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
JO  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
SP  - 22
EP  - 28
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2471-9730
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12
AB  - A study was carried out at urban and peri-urban areas of Nekemte and Ijaji towns to evaluate the effects of formulated concentrate feeds on feed intake and milk yield of upgraded dairy cows kept by smallholder dairy keepers. Twenty four lactating dairy cows within their 2nd months after calving and with similar status were selected from smallholder dairy keepers under zero grazing system whereby feed intake, BCS and milk yield data were recorded for a period of 90 days. The cows were randomly allocated to four feeding groups (T1, T2, T3 and T4) in a completely randomized design (CRD). Cows in T1, T2, T3 and T4 were fed commercial dairy feed, recommended concentrate feed of ATRC, recommended concentrate feed of HARC and recommended concentrate feed of BARC, respectively. Basal diet for all dietary treatments were natural grass hay adlibtum. The average CP (%) and IVDMD % of the natural grass hay and recommended concentrates of BARC were (8.2, 7.95) and (25.88, 10.59), respectively. The daily concentrate DM) and CP intakes were significantly different (p<0.001) among the dietary treatments with highest values being registered for T4 (8.2 and 2.12 kg/d, respectively) and for T1 7.55 and 1.77kg/d respectively while the lowest values being registered for t T2 (6.28 and 1.3 kg/d, respectively) and for T3 (5.83 and 1.12 kg/d, respectively). The daily mean milk yields were higher (P<0.001) for cows in T4 (16.42 liter/day) and in T1 (15.10 liter/day) than those for those in T2 (12.55 liter/day) and in T3 (11.66 liter/day). Milk yield was also affected by location (P<0.001) with the highest milk yield being obtained at Nekemte town (15.15 liter/day) and the lowest at Ijaji town (11.49 liter/day). The largest change noted in variable costs was birr 120.79 per day and the change observed in net income was birr 361.24 per day, resulting in a marginal rate of return of 76.69% for T4. Among the concentrates recommended different research centers and the commercial concentrate, concentrate recommended at BARC and the commercial ones increased milk production and profitability of the dairy enterprise. Therefore, Feeding these concentrate types for upgraded lactating cows under smallholder dairy keepers is profitable both biologically and economically.
VL  - 7
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Tesfaye Mediksa

Bako Agricultural Research Center, West Shoa, Bako, Ethiopia
Dereje Bekele

Bako Agricultural Research Center, West Shoa, Bako, Ethiopia
Tesfaye Marsha

Bako Agricultural Research Center, West Shoa, Bako, Ethiopia
Habtamu Abera

Bako Agricultural Research Center, West Shoa, Bako, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tesfaye Mediksa, Dereje Bekele, Tesfaye Marsha, Habtamu Abera. (2021). Evaluation of Formulated Concentrate Feeds on Feed Intake and Milk Yield of Lactating Upgraded Dairy Cows at Nekemte and Ijaji Towns. American Journal of Applied Scientific Research, 7(2), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tesfaye Mediksa; Dereje Bekele; Tesfaye Marsha; Habtamu Abera. Evaluation of Formulated Concentrate Feeds on Feed Intake and Milk Yield of Lactating Upgraded Dairy Cows at Nekemte and Ijaji Towns. Am. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2021, 7(2), 22-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tesfaye Mediksa, Dereje Bekele, Tesfaye Marsha, Habtamu Abera. Evaluation of Formulated Concentrate Feeds on Feed Intake and Milk Yield of Lactating Upgraded Dairy Cows at Nekemte and Ijaji Towns. Am J Appl Sci Res. 2021;7(2):22-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12,
  author = {Tesfaye Mediksa and Dereje Bekele and Tesfaye Marsha and Habtamu Abera},
  title = {Evaluation of Formulated Concentrate Feeds on Feed Intake and Milk Yield of Lactating Upgraded Dairy Cows at Nekemte and Ijaji Towns},
  journal = {American Journal of Applied Scientific Research},
  volume = {7},
  number = {2},
  pages = {22-28},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajasr.20210702.12},
  abstract = {A study was carried out at urban and peri-urban areas of Nekemte and Ijaji towns to evaluate the effects of formulated concentrate feeds on feed intake and milk yield of upgraded dairy cows kept by smallholder dairy keepers. Twenty four lactating dairy cows within their 2nd months after calving and with similar status were selected from smallholder dairy keepers under zero grazing system whereby feed intake, BCS and milk yield data were recorded for a period of 90 days. The cows were randomly allocated to four feeding groups (T1, T2, T3 and T4) in a completely randomized design (CRD). Cows in T1, T2, T3 and T4 were fed commercial dairy feed, recommended concentrate feed of ATRC, recommended concentrate feed of HARC and recommended concentrate feed of BARC, respectively. Basal diet for all dietary treatments were natural grass hay adlibtum. The average CP (%) and IVDMD % of the natural grass hay and recommended concentrates of BARC were (8.2, 7.95) and (25.88, 10.59), respectively. The daily concentrate DM) and CP intakes were significantly different (p<0.001) among the dietary treatments with highest values being registered for T4 (8.2 and 2.12 kg/d, respectively) and for T1 7.55 and 1.77kg/d respectively while the lowest values being registered for t T2 (6.28 and 1.3 kg/d, respectively) and for T3 (5.83 and 1.12 kg/d, respectively). The daily mean milk yields were higher (P<0.001) for cows in T4 (16.42 liter/day) and in T1 (15.10 liter/day) than those for those in T2 (12.55 liter/day) and in T3 (11.66 liter/day). Milk yield was also affected by location (P<0.001) with the highest milk yield being obtained at Nekemte town (15.15 liter/day) and the lowest at Ijaji town (11.49 liter/day). The largest change noted in variable costs was birr 120.79 per day and the change observed in net income was birr 361.24 per day, resulting in a marginal rate of return of 76.69% for T4. Among the concentrates recommended different research centers and the commercial concentrate, concentrate recommended at BARC and the commercial ones increased milk production and profitability of the dairy enterprise. Therefore, Feeding these concentrate types for upgraded lactating cows under smallholder dairy keepers is profitable both biologically and economically.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Evaluation of Formulated Concentrate Feeds on Feed Intake and Milk Yield of Lactating Upgraded Dairy Cows at Nekemte and Ijaji Towns
AU  - Tesfaye Mediksa
AU  - Dereje Bekele
AU  - Tesfaye Marsha
AU  - Habtamu Abera
Y1  - 2021/06/22
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12
T2  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
JF  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
JO  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
SP  - 22
EP  - 28
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2471-9730
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.12
AB  - A study was carried out at urban and peri-urban areas of Nekemte and Ijaji towns to evaluate the effects of formulated concentrate feeds on feed intake and milk yield of upgraded dairy cows kept by smallholder dairy keepers. Twenty four lactating dairy cows within their 2nd months after calving and with similar status were selected from smallholder dairy keepers under zero grazing system whereby feed intake, BCS and milk yield data were recorded for a period of 90 days. The cows were randomly allocated to four feeding groups (T1, T2, T3 and T4) in a completely randomized design (CRD). Cows in T1, T2, T3 and T4 were fed commercial dairy feed, recommended concentrate feed of ATRC, recommended concentrate feed of HARC and recommended concentrate feed of BARC, respectively. Basal diet for all dietary treatments were natural grass hay adlibtum. The average CP (%) and IVDMD % of the natural grass hay and recommended concentrates of BARC were (8.2, 7.95) and (25.88, 10.59), respectively. The daily concentrate DM) and CP intakes were significantly different (p<0.001) among the dietary treatments with highest values being registered for T4 (8.2 and 2.12 kg/d, respectively) and for T1 7.55 and 1.77kg/d respectively while the lowest values being registered for t T2 (6.28 and 1.3 kg/d, respectively) and for T3 (5.83 and 1.12 kg/d, respectively). The daily mean milk yields were higher (P<0.001) for cows in T4 (16.42 liter/day) and in T1 (15.10 liter/day) than those for those in T2 (12.55 liter/day) and in T3 (11.66 liter/day). Milk yield was also affected by location (P<0.001) with the highest milk yield being obtained at Nekemte town (15.15 liter/day) and the lowest at Ijaji town (11.49 liter/day). The largest change noted in variable costs was birr 120.79 per day and the change observed in net income was birr 361.24 per day, resulting in a marginal rate of return of 76.69% for T4. Among the concentrates recommended different research centers and the commercial concentrate, concentrate recommended at BARC and the commercial ones increased milk production and profitability of the dairy enterprise. Therefore, Feeding these concentrate types for upgraded lactating cows under smallholder dairy keepers is profitable both biologically and economically.
VL  - 7
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download