Investigation of Yarn Quality in Ring Yarn by Modifying Bottom Apron/Nose Bar with Perforations and Air-Suction

Bantamlak Birlie; Sampath Rangaraj

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Investigation of Yarn Quality in Ring Yarn by Modifying Bottom Apron/Nose Bar with Perforations and Air-Suction

Bantamlak Birlie, Sampath Rangaraj

Published in American Journal of Applied Scientific Research (Volume 7, Issue 3)

Received: 30 August 2021 Accepted: 14 September 2021 Published: 26 September 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Currently, ring spinning has limitations of poor integration of fibers that protrude from yarn surface, which causes hairiness and irregularity. The aim of this research is to improve yarn quality by modification of bottom apron/nose bar with perforation and applying air-suction in a conventional Reiter G35 ring frame and spinning 29.52 Tex (20 Ne) and 14.76 Tex (40 Ne). To produce modified yarn 17 combinations of apron hole diameter, suction pressure, and widthwise hole distance was used. The ANOVA result shows that as suction pressure increases hairiness, tenacity, and thick place (+50%/km) were improved significantly for both counts. Based on the result suction pressure, apron hole diameter, and hole distance were optimized to 23.9 mbar, 1.58 mm and 10 mm respectively for 40 Ne and 25 mbar, 1.75 mm, and 11.6 mm respectively for 20 Ne. As compared with conventional hairiness, tenacity, thin place, and thick place of 40 Ne modified yarn were improved by 16.25%, 12.7%, 17.42%, and 14.62% respectively. Whereas hairiness, tenacity, and thick place of 20 Ne modified yarn were improved by 8.87%, 7.42%, and 18.2% respectively. Thus, the modified G35 method of yarn condensing has capability to be used as an alternative method of conventional spinning as it is capable of producing better quality yarn.

Published in	American Journal of Applied Scientific Research (Volume 7, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14
Page(s)	56-76
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Apron Hole Diameter, Condensed Yarn, Suction Air Pressure, Hole Distance, Yarn Quality

References

[1]	Uddin, F., Introductory Chapter: Textile Manufacturing Processes, in Textile Manufacturing Processes. 2019, Intech Open.
[2]	Mohan, J., Global Textile Industry: Recent Trends in the Market. 2019. 2019.
[3]	Kotb, N., Predicting yarn quality performance based on fibers types and yarn structure. Life Science Journal, 2012. 9 (3): p. 1009-1015.
[4]	Kumar, A., S. Ishtiaque, and K. Salhotra. Compact spinning: a critical review. in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. 2003.
[5]	Saha, S. K. and J. Hossen, Impact of Doubling and Auto leveling in Draw Frame on the Quality of Rotor-Spun Yarns. 2019.
[6]	Saravanan, A. R. and S. Subramanian, Study on the Change in Characteristics of Ring Yarn during Post Spinning and Yarn Dyeing Operations. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 2018.
[7]	Lawrence, C. A., Fundamentals of spun yarn technology. 2003: Crc Press.
[8]	Lawrence, C. A., Advances in yarn spinning technology. 2010: Elsevier.
[9]	Patil, N. P., P. Rachivkar, and A. M. ArurKamundi, Imrprove productivity of the ring frame. The Indian Textile Journal, 2011.
[10]	Thilagavathi, G. and T. Karthik, Process control and yarn quality in spinning. 2016: CRC Press.
[11]	Kumar, R. S., Process management in spinning. 2014: CRC Press.
[12]	Rengasamy, R., A. Patnaik, and H. Punekar, Studies on reduction of yarn hairiness by nozzles in ring spinning and winding by airflow simulation. Fibers and Polymers, 2006. 7 (3): p. 317-322.
[13]	El-Sayed, M. and S. Sanad, Compact spinning technology, in Advances in Yarn Spinning Technology. 2010, Elsevier. p. 237-260.
[14]	Ahmad, M. M., Future spinning technology: Compact spinning. PTJ, 2009. 58 (2): p. 52-54.
[15]	Bhokare, A. D. K. a. P. D., Overview of Various Compact Spinning Mechanisms. Fiber to fashion, 2009.
[16]	Altas, S. and H. Kadoğlu, Comparison of conventional ring, mechanical compact and pneumatic compact yarn spinning systems. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 2012. 7 (1): p. 155892501200700110.
[17]	Almetwally, A. A., et al., Comparison between physical properties of ring-spun yarn and compact yarns spun from different pneumatic compacting systems. 2015.
[18]	Abou-Nassif, G. A., A comparative study between physical properties of compact and ring yarn fabrics produced from medium and coarser yarn counts. Journal of Textiles, 2014.
[19]	Murugan, R., C. Vigneswaran, and A. Ghosh, Novel technique for improving yarn quality and reducing hairiness in conventional ring frame. 2011.
[20]	Qiu, H., et al., A novel method to reduce hairiness level of ring spun yarn. Fibers and Polymers, 2012. 13 (1): p. 104-109.
[21]	Yilmaz, D. and M. Usal, The effect of different nozzle configurations on airflow behaviour and yarn quality. International Journal of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 2012. 6 (11): p. 2310-2314.
[22]	Klein, W. and H. Stalder, The Rieter manual of spinning. Rieter, Winterthur, 2014.
[23]	Yilmaz, D. and M. R. Usal, Effect of nozzle structural parameters on hairiness of compact-jet yarns. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 2012. 7 (2): p. 155892501200700209.
[24]	Yilmaz, D. and M. R. Usal, Improvement in yarn hairiness by the siro-jet spinning method. Textile Research Journal, 2013. 83 (10): p. 1081-1100.
[25]	YU, Q. H. L. Q. F., L. Qiaoli, and Y. Fu, EFFECTS OF GEOMETRY ON THE PERFORMANCE OF SWIRL NOZZLE. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 2015. 25 (1): p. 61-65.
[26]	Zhang, X. C., H. X. Zhang, and L. D. Cheng. Effect of Negative Pressure on Yarn Quality in Compact Spinning with Inspiratory Groove. in Advanced Materials Research. 2013. Trans Tech Publ.
[27]	Yilmaz, D. and M. R. Usal, A comparison of compact-jet, compact, and conventional ring-spun yarns. Textile Research Journal, 2011. 81 (5): p. 459-470.
[28]	Wang, X., Recent Research on Yarn Hairiness Testing and Reduction: Part - Reduction of Yarn Hairiness. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, 1999. 3 (1): p. 1-8.
[29]	Tyagi, G., Yarn structure and properties from different spinning techniques, in Advances in Yarn Spinning Technology. 2010, Elsevier. p. 119-154.
[30]	Yang, S. and S. Gordon, Accurate prediction of cotton ring-spun yarn quality from high-volume instrument and mill processing data. Textile Research Journal, 2017. 87 (9): p. 1025-1039.
[31]	Stadler, H., The Rieter Manual of Spinning. 2016, Volume.
[32]	Chakrabortty, A., A. HOSSAIN, and J. GHOSH, Study on the Effect of Air Suction Pressure on the Quality of Compact Yarn by Changing the Frequency of Inverter. Tekstil ve Mühendis, 2020. 27 (119): p. 154-158.
[33]	Yilmaz, D. and M. R. Usal, Characterization of Jetring yarn structure and properties. Science and Engineering of Composite Materials, 2011. 18 (3): p. 127-137.
[34]	Sundaresan, S., et al., A novel method of hairiness reduction by modified lappet design and separator in conventional ring frame.
[35]	Almetwally, A. A. and M. M. Salem, Comparison between mechanical properties of fabrics woven from compact and ring spun yarns. Autex Research Journal, 2010. 10 (1): p. 35-40.
[36]	Liu, X., et al., Research on pneumatic compact spun yarn quality. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 2015. 106 (4): p. 431-442.
[37]	Liu, S. Q., et al. Effect of Siro-Spun Processing Parameters on Properties of 55/45 Flax/Cotton Blended Yarn. in Advanced Materials Research. 2011. Trans Tech Publ.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Bantamlak Birlie, Sampath Rangaraj. (2021). Investigation of Yarn Quality in Ring Yarn by Modifying Bottom Apron/Nose Bar with Perforations and Air-Suction. American Journal of Applied Scientific Research, 7(3), 56-76. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Bantamlak Birlie; Sampath Rangaraj. Investigation of Yarn Quality in Ring Yarn by Modifying Bottom Apron/Nose Bar with Perforations and Air-Suction. Am. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2021, 7(3), 56-76. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Bantamlak Birlie, Sampath Rangaraj. Investigation of Yarn Quality in Ring Yarn by Modifying Bottom Apron/Nose Bar with Perforations and Air-Suction. Am J Appl Sci Res. 2021;7(3):56-76. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14,
  author = {Bantamlak Birlie and Sampath Rangaraj},
  title = {Investigation of Yarn Quality in Ring Yarn by Modifying Bottom Apron/Nose Bar with Perforations and Air-Suction},
  journal = {American Journal of Applied Scientific Research},
  volume = {7},
  number = {3},
  pages = {56-76},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajasr.20210703.14},
  abstract = {Currently, ring spinning has limitations of poor integration of fibers that protrude from yarn surface, which causes hairiness and irregularity. The aim of this research is to improve yarn quality by modification of bottom apron/nose bar with perforation and applying air-suction in a conventional Reiter G35 ring frame and spinning 29.52 Tex (20 Ne) and 14.76 Tex (40 Ne). To produce modified yarn 17 combinations of apron hole diameter, suction pressure, and widthwise hole distance was used. The ANOVA result shows that as suction pressure increases hairiness, tenacity, and thick place (+50%/km) were improved significantly for both counts. Based on the result suction pressure, apron hole diameter, and hole distance were optimized to 23.9 mbar, 1.58 mm and 10 mm respectively for 40 Ne and 25 mbar, 1.75 mm, and 11.6 mm respectively for 20 Ne. As compared with conventional hairiness, tenacity, thin place, and thick place of 40 Ne modified yarn were improved by 16.25%, 12.7%, 17.42%, and 14.62% respectively. Whereas hairiness, tenacity, and thick place of 20 Ne modified yarn were improved by 8.87%, 7.42%, and 18.2% respectively. Thus, the modified G35 method of yarn condensing has capability to be used as an alternative method of conventional spinning as it is capable of producing better quality yarn.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Investigation of Yarn Quality in Ring Yarn by Modifying Bottom Apron/Nose Bar with Perforations and Air-Suction
AU  - Bantamlak Birlie
AU  - Sampath Rangaraj
Y1  - 2021/09/26
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14
T2  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
JF  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
JO  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
SP  - 56
EP  - 76
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2471-9730
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14
AB  - Currently, ring spinning has limitations of poor integration of fibers that protrude from yarn surface, which causes hairiness and irregularity. The aim of this research is to improve yarn quality by modification of bottom apron/nose bar with perforation and applying air-suction in a conventional Reiter G35 ring frame and spinning 29.52 Tex (20 Ne) and 14.76 Tex (40 Ne). To produce modified yarn 17 combinations of apron hole diameter, suction pressure, and widthwise hole distance was used. The ANOVA result shows that as suction pressure increases hairiness, tenacity, and thick place (+50%/km) were improved significantly for both counts. Based on the result suction pressure, apron hole diameter, and hole distance were optimized to 23.9 mbar, 1.58 mm and 10 mm respectively for 40 Ne and 25 mbar, 1.75 mm, and 11.6 mm respectively for 20 Ne. As compared with conventional hairiness, tenacity, thin place, and thick place of 40 Ne modified yarn were improved by 16.25%, 12.7%, 17.42%, and 14.62% respectively. Whereas hairiness, tenacity, and thick place of 20 Ne modified yarn were improved by 8.87%, 7.42%, and 18.2% respectively. Thus, the modified G35 method of yarn condensing has capability to be used as an alternative method of conventional spinning as it is capable of producing better quality yarn.
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Bantamlak Birlie

Department of Textile Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia
Sampath Rangaraj

Department of Textile Engineering, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Bantamlak Birlie, Sampath Rangaraj. (2021). Investigation of Yarn Quality in Ring Yarn by Modifying Bottom Apron/Nose Bar with Perforations and Air-Suction. American Journal of Applied Scientific Research, 7(3), 56-76. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Bantamlak Birlie; Sampath Rangaraj. Investigation of Yarn Quality in Ring Yarn by Modifying Bottom Apron/Nose Bar with Perforations and Air-Suction. Am. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2021, 7(3), 56-76. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Bantamlak Birlie, Sampath Rangaraj. Investigation of Yarn Quality in Ring Yarn by Modifying Bottom Apron/Nose Bar with Perforations and Air-Suction. Am J Appl Sci Res. 2021;7(3):56-76. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14,
  author = {Bantamlak Birlie and Sampath Rangaraj},
  title = {Investigation of Yarn Quality in Ring Yarn by Modifying Bottom Apron/Nose Bar with Perforations and Air-Suction},
  journal = {American Journal of Applied Scientific Research},
  volume = {7},
  number = {3},
  pages = {56-76},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajasr.20210703.14},
  abstract = {Currently, ring spinning has limitations of poor integration of fibers that protrude from yarn surface, which causes hairiness and irregularity. The aim of this research is to improve yarn quality by modification of bottom apron/nose bar with perforation and applying air-suction in a conventional Reiter G35 ring frame and spinning 29.52 Tex (20 Ne) and 14.76 Tex (40 Ne). To produce modified yarn 17 combinations of apron hole diameter, suction pressure, and widthwise hole distance was used. The ANOVA result shows that as suction pressure increases hairiness, tenacity, and thick place (+50%/km) were improved significantly for both counts. Based on the result suction pressure, apron hole diameter, and hole distance were optimized to 23.9 mbar, 1.58 mm and 10 mm respectively for 40 Ne and 25 mbar, 1.75 mm, and 11.6 mm respectively for 20 Ne. As compared with conventional hairiness, tenacity, thin place, and thick place of 40 Ne modified yarn were improved by 16.25%, 12.7%, 17.42%, and 14.62% respectively. Whereas hairiness, tenacity, and thick place of 20 Ne modified yarn were improved by 8.87%, 7.42%, and 18.2% respectively. Thus, the modified G35 method of yarn condensing has capability to be used as an alternative method of conventional spinning as it is capable of producing better quality yarn.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Investigation of Yarn Quality in Ring Yarn by Modifying Bottom Apron/Nose Bar with Perforations and Air-Suction
AU  - Bantamlak Birlie
AU  - Sampath Rangaraj
Y1  - 2021/09/26
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14
T2  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
JF  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
JO  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
SP  - 56
EP  - 76
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2471-9730
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.14
AB  - Currently, ring spinning has limitations of poor integration of fibers that protrude from yarn surface, which causes hairiness and irregularity. The aim of this research is to improve yarn quality by modification of bottom apron/nose bar with perforation and applying air-suction in a conventional Reiter G35 ring frame and spinning 29.52 Tex (20 Ne) and 14.76 Tex (40 Ne). To produce modified yarn 17 combinations of apron hole diameter, suction pressure, and widthwise hole distance was used. The ANOVA result shows that as suction pressure increases hairiness, tenacity, and thick place (+50%/km) were improved significantly for both counts. Based on the result suction pressure, apron hole diameter, and hole distance were optimized to 23.9 mbar, 1.58 mm and 10 mm respectively for 40 Ne and 25 mbar, 1.75 mm, and 11.6 mm respectively for 20 Ne. As compared with conventional hairiness, tenacity, thin place, and thick place of 40 Ne modified yarn were improved by 16.25%, 12.7%, 17.42%, and 14.62% respectively. Whereas hairiness, tenacity, and thick place of 20 Ne modified yarn were improved by 8.87%, 7.42%, and 18.2% respectively. Thus, the modified G35 method of yarn condensing has capability to be used as an alternative method of conventional spinning as it is capable of producing better quality yarn.
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download