Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Identifying Limiting Nutrients for Wheat Production Through Omission Plot Experiment on Nitisols of East Gojjam Zone, North Western Ethiopia

Received: 21 July 2024     Accepted: 27 August 2024     Published: 11 September 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to identify the most yield limiting nutrients for wheat yield on Nitisols of D/Eliase District North western Ethiopia during 2021/22 main cropping season. The experiments were laid out in a completely randomized block design (RCBD) each with three replications. The treatments were control, NP, PKSZnB (-N), NKSZnB (-P), NPSZnB (-K), NPKZnB (-S), NPKSZn (-B), NPKSB (-Zn) and full fertilization (+NPKSZnB). The available data were collected and subjected to ANOVA using SAS 9.3 software. The LSD test was used to separate means at 5% level of significance. According to the results obtained, considerable reduced in plant height, spike length, grain and biomass yield was recorded due to omission of N and P nutrients compared with fully fertilized plots. The highest yield reduction was recorded due to omission of N followed by P in the study district. The highest grain yield of wheat (2835.20kgha-1) was measured from recommended NP fertilized plots while the lowest grain yields (357.50kgha-1 and 545.90kgha-1) were obtained from the control and N omitted plots respectively. Therefore, N and P were found to be the most yield limiting nutrients for wheat production indicating that the inherent N and P supplying capacity of soil is very low. Thus, N and P nutrients should be applied in optimum dose for efficient nutrient uptake which ultimately increases wheat productivity. The highest agronomic efficiency (19.08 kg grain/kg nutrient applied) was recorded from plots treated with recommended NP fertilizer. In addition the highest profits realized with application of recommended NP fertilizer compared with other treatments The economics of wheat cultivation therefore indicates that omission of (-N) and (-P) nutrients results in losses. Omission of nitrogen (-N) followed by omission of phosphorus (-P) has more impact on wheat yield and profits in the study area.

Published in American Journal of Applied Scientific Research (Volume 10, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajasr.20241003.12
Page(s) 49-56
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Economic Return, Indigenous Nutrient Supply, Nutrient Omission

1. Introduction
The presence of variability of soil fertility status in smallholder farming systems in Ethiopia is currently a major factor that affects productivity and the suitability of crop and nutrient management recommendation for different locations at various spatial scales. Due to this, there is unbalanced fertilization to crops which ultimately results yield gaps in most areas of Ethiopia. Declining yield trend and yield gap between maximum observed and national average yield of wheat in Ethiopia required urgent research to determine fertilizer use in wheat producing areas. In such a case implementing nutrient omission experiment supports the development and dissemination of site-specific nutrient management (SSNM) options for crop production systems. Moreover, nutrient omission technique provides a systematic framework to identify the inherent nutrient supplying capacity of the soil and for applying site-specific nutrients of both macro and micro nutrients in heterogeneous production systems.
So far, fertilizer application in Ethiopia was mainly focused only two major plant nutrients, N and P in the form of DAP and urea, whereas very little attention has been given to other macro and micronutrients . However, revealed that in addition to (N and P), sulfur, potassium, copper, manganese, iron, boron and zinc deficiencies are widespread in Ethiopian soils. This analysis led to formulate variety of nutrients or blended fertilizers for a country-wide uses in Ethiopia. However, the decision made on the changing of fertilizer system took little or no consultation of information, particularly from research system. The demonstrations of the newly formulated blended fertilizers came before the research system made recommendation and the fertilizer materials, the blended nutrients used for the validations were not appropriate for research since the cause confounding effects.
Currently blended fertilizer is applied in Ethiopia based on blanket recommendation which assumes that the need of a crop for nutrients is constant over time and large areas without considering whether the soil is deficient for that formulated nutrients or not. However, the need for supplemental nutrients vary greatly among fields, seasons and years and a blanket dose of fertilizer will not fit to all fields. The nutrient requirement of a crop is therefore, depends upon the nutrient supplying capacity of particular soil. Determination of soil capacity to supply major nutrients (N, P, S, K, Zn and B) is therefore pre-requisite regarding increasing crop yield and nutrient use efficiency. Nutrient omission plot technique is therefore a useful tool to quantify nutrient supplying capacity of soil where all the other major nutrients are supplied other than the nutrient in question.
Imbalanced fertilizer application will make depletion of soil nutrients leading to production decline as well as deterioration of soil physical and chemical properties. Apart from these, imbalanced fertilization increases cost of production because any amount more than the required type/does is nothing but a waste. Therefore, individual field has to be assessed for their nutrient supplying capacity so that fertilizer required for certain targeted yield can be developed. Thus, the current experiment was implemented to identify the most important yield limiting nutrient for wheat production at D/Eliase district.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Description of the Study Area
A field experiment was conducted on farmers’ fields to estimate the native nutrient supplying capacity of soil on the Nitisols of D/Eliase District North-western Ethiopia during the main cropping season (2021/22). The experimental site was selected systematically to cover a wide range of major wheat growing areas in the district. Geographically, the experimental site was located between 07° 40' 09 3'' N latitude and 037° 14' 41.5'' E longitudes with an elevation of 2234 meters above sea level. According to the data obtained from D/Markose Meteorological Station (informal personal communication), the average minimum and maximum temperature and mean annual rainfall of the experimental sites were 12.64°C, 28.36°C and 1198 mm, respectively. The predominant soil type of the study area, in particular, is Nitisols which have a reddish colour with moderately acidic in reaction.
2.2. Treatments and Experimental Design
Nine treatments of six single nutrients combinations (N120, P40, K50, S10.5, Zn5 and B1 kg ha-1) were tested. Each rate of nutrient was set based on the recommendation given by reviewing scientific literatures. Even though farmers are not growing wheat without fertilizer, control treatment was included for comparison among the rest of the treatments. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The gross plot area was 12m2 (4 m*3 m), which accommodated 20 rows while the net plot area was 10.8 m2 (3.6 m*3 m).
Table 1. Treatments of omission plot experiment.

Treatments

Description of treatments

Control

Without any external application of nutrient sources

Reco. NP

To compare combination of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer with others

PKSZnB (-N)

To determine the indigenous N supplying capacity of the soil

NKSZnB (-P)

To determine the indigenous P supplying capacity of the soil

NPSZnB (-K)

To determine the indigenous K supplying capacity of the soil

NPKZnB (-S)

To determine the indigenous S supplying capacity of the soil

NPKSZn (-B)

To determine the indigenous B supplying capacity of the soil

NPKSB (-Zn)

To determine indigenous Zn supplying capacity of the soil

NPKSZnB

To determine the maximum attainable yield with application of full dose of nutrients

2.3. Experimental Materials and Planting Procedures
High yielding (Wanie) wheat variety was used as a test crop. Full doses of all nutrients in the respective treatments except the nutrient to be omitted were applied at planting. Nitrogen in the form of urea was applied in splits where half rate during planting and the remaining half rate was applied (3-4 weeks after planting). Urea, Triple Super Phosphate (TSP), Murate of Potash (KCl), Magnesium Sulfate (MgSO4.2H2O), Zinc Sulfate (ZnSO4. 7H2O) and Borax (Na2B4O7.5H2O) were used as sources of N, P, K, S, Zn and B, respectively. All cultural practices were done uniformly for all plots, as per the recommendation set for wheat production in the area. Harvesting was done manually from the net plot area when the crop physiologically matured.
2.4. Measurement of Crop Parameters
Data on a plant basis was recorded from the central net harvestable rows/plots of 10.8 m2 (3.6 m* 3 m). The collected data include plant height, spike length, grain yield and aboveground biomass yield. Plant height (cm) was recorded from 10 randomly selected plants at physiological maturity which was measured from the base of the stem of the main plant to the tip of the main shoot or spike, excluding awns. Spike length (cm) was measured from 10 randomly selected plants with scale from the basal joint of the spike till the terminal spike excluding awns. Grain yield (economic yield) was determined from the entire net plots and converted into kilogram per hectare where the actual grain yield was adjusted to 12.5% standard moisture level. Above-ground biomass yield (Biological yield) was measured from the weight of aboveground biomass for plants in a net plot area and converted to kilogram per hectare. Harvest Index (%) was determined as a ratio of grain yield to above-ground biological yield on a dry weight basis in percentage as described in the following formula.
HI %=Grain yieldAboveground biomass yield*100
Agronomic efficiency (AE): refers to the additional produce obtained in kg kg-1 of an applied nutrient which was calculated using the formula of as follows:
AE=Grain yield of fertilized plot-grain yield of unfertilized plotQuantity of fertilizer applied
Data Analysis
The collected data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) appropriate to RCBD using SAS Institute 9.3 version software and the interpretations were made following the procedure described by Gomez and Gomez . The least significant difference (LSD) test at 5% probability level was used for treatment mean comparison when the ANOVA showed significant differences among treatments.
Economic Analysis
Economic analysis was done to investigate the economic feasibility of treatments that would give acceptable returns at low risk to farmers following the procedures . While doing the economic analysis, the average grain yield obtained from each plot was adjusted to 10% downward to reflect the difference between researchers experimental plot yield and the yield farmers will expect from the same treatment because researchers are using small plot sizes and applying better crop management practices during experimentation.
3. Results and Discussion
Effect of Nutrient Omission on Growth and Yield Attributes
The ANOVA table showed there was highly significant variations observed among treatments on plant height, spike length, grain yield, above ground biomass yield and harvest index of wheat due to nutrient omission at all locations as indicated (Table 2).
The data revealed that N omitted plot has produced the shortest plant height (56.29 cm) and spike length (4.46 cm) followed by P omitted plots whereas the tallest plant height (86.31 cm) was recorded from NP fertilized plots which was stastically similar with fully fertilized plots. A plant height recorded from N missed plot was statistically similar with unfertilized (control) plots indicating the inherent supplying capacity of the study soil was too low and N is the most important plant nutrient followed by P. Application of NP fertilizer significantly increased plant height by 77.08%, 53% and 21.26% over control, N omitted and P omitted plots respectively. The variation in plant height due to different nutrient combinations was considered to be due to variation in the availability of major nutrients in the soil. Chemical fertilizer offers nutrients which are readily soluble in soil solution and thereby instantaneously available to plants. The data thus indicates that majority of plant growth in terms of height was controlled by N fertilization due to its role in cell division. A similar reduction in plant height of rice and BT cotton was reported by respectively due to omission of nitrogen.
Major plant nutrient elements significantly affected the spike length of wheat where application of NP produced the highest spike length (6.99 cm) whereas the shortest spike length (3.83 cm) was recorded from the control plots. Omission of N and P from fully fertilized plots significantly reduced the number of spike length by 49.78% and 16.99% respectively whereas omission of S, K, Zn and B produced statistically similar result compared with fully fertilized plots indicating application of the above mentioned nutrients (S, K, Zn and B) have no significant contribution rather than a wastage in the study area. On the other hand omission of N produced significantly lower spike length followed by P compared with others indicating N and P nutrients are the two most important nutrients in the study area. An important advantage of commercial N and P fertilizers is that these nutrients made in a form that can absorbed by plants easily and immediately after fertilization, which enhanced vegetative growth of the crop, high Photosynthetic activity and vigorous vegetative growth of the crop. Therefore, adequate application of N and P increased the total dry matter and probably favored the cellular activity during spikelet formation and development which is in conformity with the finding of .
Table 2. Effect of nutrient omission on plant height and spike length at each testing kebele.

Treatments

Dejiba Kebele

Genet Kebele

Guay Kebele

Yetenter Kebele

Yekegat Kebele

Degolima Kebele

Ph (cm)

SL (cm)

Ph (cm)

SL (cm)

Ph (cm)

SL (cm)

Ph (cm)

SL (cm)

Ph (cm)

SL (cm)

Ph (cm)

SL (cm)

Control

53.87f

3.47c

57.80f

4.60e

46.50d

4.10c

50.60d

3.90b

40.33d

2.50f

43.30e

4.33d

-N

61.77e

4.37bc

62.83e

5.20e

54.00c

4.50c

54.90d

4.00b

52.93c

3.50e

51.30d

5.20cd

-P

70.57d

5.17b

76.67d

6.10d

70.90b

5.60b

78.80c

6.10a

68.68b

5.20d

61.47c

6.10bc

Reco. NP

93.87a

6.87a

90.60ab

8.00a

80.50a

6.40ab

89.80a

7.00a

85.00a

6.40abc

78.07a

7.30a

-S

85.47c

6.47a

85.27c

6.60cd

79.80a

6.73a

85.60ab

6.20a

85.00a

5.80cd

72.00ab

6.60ab

-K

86.87bc

7.27a

87.07bc

7.10bc

80.80a

6.30ab

85.80ab

6.30a

83.73a

6.20abc

69.77b

6.20bc

-Zn

90.27ab

6.60a

88.30abc

6.80bc

83.90a

6.70a

84.50b

6.50a

86.67a

7.00a

73.00ab

6.70ab

-B

88.43bc

7.17a

91.40a

7.27b

83.40a

6.40ab

86.10ab

6.90a

83.20a

6.10bc

74.30ab

6.70ab

All

85.90bc

6.83a

90.87ab

6.90bc

83.60a

6.30ab

88.10ab

6.70a

87.93a

6.73ab

76.40ab

6.50ab

CV (%)

3.45

11.98

2.74

5.12

5.84

9.39

3.81

9.97

4.98

8.61

6.48

9.52

LSD (0.05)

4.75

1.25

3.85

0.58

7.45

0.96

5.16

1.03

6.45

0.82

7.47

1.02

P - value

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

**

Effect of nutrient omissions on grain yield was highly significant. Among all the treatments, the highest grain yield (2835.20 kgha-1) was obtained from NP fertilized plots and the lowest grain yield (357.5 kgha-1 and 545.9 kgha-1) was recorded from control and N missed plots respectively followed by P omitted plots which was (1505.9 kgha-1). The lowest grain yield obtained from N omitted plots indicates N cannot be substituted by any other nutrient and has the highest contribution in wheat yield. This confirms that N is the most limiting nutrient for crop production in many areas of the world and its efficient use is not only important for the economic sustainability of cropping systems, but also for safeguarding environment from pollution. It could be due effect of N on chlorophyll formation, photosynthesis and assimilated production because N deficiency reduces crop photosynthesis by reducing leaf area development and leaf photosynthesis rate by accelerating the leaf senescence . Moreover, under N deficiencies, a considerably large proportion of dry matter is partitioned to roots than shoots, leading to reduced shoot/root dry weight ratio and consequently the grain yield.
Table 3. Impact of nutrient omission on grain yield and biomass yield at each testing kebele.

Treatments

Dejiba Kebele

Genet Kebele

Guay Kebele

GY (kgha-1)

AGBY (kgha-1)

GY (kgha-1)

AGBY (kgha-1)

GY (kgha-1)

AGBY (kgha-1)

Control

235.0f

696.3d

421.5c

9997.5d

284.2d

563.0c

-N

526.6f

1592.6c

621.8c

1584.0d

611.8d

1512.3c

-P

1407.8e

2969.1b

1918.1b

4321.0c

1896.4c

4312.3b

Reco.NP

2693.0a

5493.8a

2751.5a

6148.1a

3246.2a

5685.2a

-S

2034.4d

4799.4a

2128.5ab

4482.7bc

1981.2c

4314.8b

-K

2403.5abc

5024.7a

2252.0ab

4959.1abc

2540b

5114.8ab

-Zn

2129.9cd

4682.7a

2423.1ab

4938.3abc

2674.2b

5413.6ab

-B

2235.9bcd

4938.3a

2691.2a

5901.2ab

2381bc

5388.9ab

All

2494.7ab

5046.3a

2667.6a

5459.9abc

2608.8b

5498.8ab

CV (%)

10.29

12.19

20.87

20.39

13.89

17.72

LSD (0.05)

319.89

826.56

717.39

1521.5

486.83

1288.4

P-Value

***

***

***

***

***

***

Table 3. Continued.

Treatments

Yetenter Kebele

Yekegat Kebele

Degolima Kebele

GY (kgha-1)

AGBY (kgha-1)

GY (kgha-1)

AGBY (kgha-1)

GY (kgha-1)

AGBY (kgha-1)

Control

328.3e

1042c

288.8d

622.2d

490.0f

1308.6e

-N

519.5e

1481.5c

505.5d

1306cd

587.0f

1765.4e

-P

1994.1d

4506.2b

866.4c

1790.1c

951.5e

3129.6d

Reco.NP

2882.3a

6864.2a

2500a

5108ab

2938.5a

6174.1a

-S

2625.4ab

5246.9b

2113.4b

4166.7b

2037bcd

3943.2cd

-K

2404.6bc

5419.8b

2557.8a

5235.8a

2295.4bc

5005abc

-Zn

2030.1cd

5185.2b

2131.9b

4611ab

1896.7d

4124.7cd

-B

2214.3cd

4901.2b

2553.6a

4556ab

1951.2cd

4456.8bc

All

2425.7bc

5370.4b

2250.1ab

5424.7a

2306.9b

5493.8ab

CV (%)

12.23

17.15

11.72

15.48

11.69

17.21

LSD (0.05)

409.97

1320.2

355.41

977.38

347.3

1171.5

P-Value

***

***

***

***

***

***

The differences in grain yield expressed as penalties (%) on grain yield were somehow similar (4.04-78.25%) with biological yield (4.72%-72.80%). Omission of N resulted on highest grain yield declines (78.25 %) followed by P (40.00 %) which was far greater than the yield obtained due to application of all nutrients. Compared among each treatments, yield reduction were ranked as omission of N > P > S > Zn > B > K indicating N was the most yield limiting nutrient, followed by P and S while K is the least important nutrient for wheat yield in the study area. The reduction of photosynthetic area due to absence of N and hampered energy relations due to omission of P together have more damaging effects than the individual function impairment effects. Similar differential reductions in grain and straw yield of maize were reported by due to -N and -P plots which are in conformity with the current result. Omission of N and P has caused identical reductions trend in grain and biological yields. The trend in biological yield was the same as that of grain yield.
Table 4. Impact of nutrient omissions on growth, yield and harvest index of Wheat (Combined analysis).

Nutrient (s) Omitted (-)

Plant height (cm)

Spike Length (cm)

Grain Yield (kgha-1)

Biomass Yield (kgha-1)

Harvest Index (%)

Control

48.74e

3.83e

357.50f

947.70g

38.28d

-N

56.29d

4.46d

545.90f

1464.10f

39.99cd

-P

71.18c

5.71c

1505.70e

3504.70e

43.70bc

Reco. NP

86.31a

6.99a

2835.20a

5912.20a

48.76a

-S

82.19b

6.41b

2153.30d

4492.30d

48.48a

-K

82.34b

6.55b

2408.90bc

5128.20bc

47.02ab

-Zn

84.44ab

6.71ab

2214.30cd

4825.90cd

46.83ab

-B

84.48ab

6.74ab

2287.30

5023.70bc

46.07ab

All

85.47a

6.68ab

2509.60b

5382.30b

46.95ab

CV (%)

5.15

9.81

16.56

18.61

14.65

LSD (0.05)

2.57

0.38

203.85

499.78

4.35

P-value

**

**

**

**

**

Table 5. Impact of nutrient omissions on yield, yield response and Yield penalty of Wheat.

Nutrient (s) omitted (-)

Yield (kgha-1) over no nutrient omission

Yield Response

Yield penalty (%) over no nutrient omission

Biological

Grain

Biological

Grain

Biological

Grain

Control

947.70

357.50

4434.60

2152.10

-82.39

-85.75

-N

1464.10

545.90

3918.20

1963.70

-72.80

-78.25

-P

3504.70

1505.70

1877.60

1003.90

-34.88

-40.00

Reco. NP

5912.20

2835.20

-530.10

-325.60

9.85

129.74

-S

4492.30

2153.30

890.00

356.30

-16.54

-14.20

-K

5128.20

2408.30

254.10

101.30

-4.72

-4.04

-Zn

4825.90

2214.30

556.40

295.30

-10.34

-11.77

-B

5023.70

2287.30

359.30

222.30

-6.68

-8.86

No omission

5382.30

2509.60

*Yield response: grain yield in no omission plot - grain yield of omission plot
** Yield penalty (%) = (yield in no omission plot - yield of omission plot)*10
Table 6. Impacts of nutrient omission on economics of wheat cultivation.

Nutrient (s) omitted (-)

GY (kgha-1)

Adj. GY (kgha-1)

Economics

Benefit cost ratio (ETB ha-1)

Cost of Cultivation (ETB ha-1)

Gross income (ETB ha-1)

Net income (ETB ha-1)

Control

357.50

321.75

0.00

9652.50

9652.50

-

-N

545.90

491.31

13531.62

14739.30

1207.68

1.09

-P

1505.70

1355.13

13966.40

40653.90

26687.50

2.91

Reco. NP

2835.20

2551.68

20434.78

76550.40

56115.62

3.75

-S

2153.30

1937.97

23409.11

58139.10

34729.99

2.48

-K

2408.90

2168.01

21854.40

65040.30

43185.90

2.98

-Zn

2214.30

1992.87

23347.13

59786.10

36438.97

2.56

-B

2287.30

2058.57

23723.34

61757.10

38033.76

2.60

No omission

2509.60

2258.64

23966.40

67759.20

43792.80

2.83

Where; Adj. GY = Adjusted Grain Yield down to 10%, GY = Grain Yield, ETB = Ethiopian Birr.
Agronomic Efficiency (AE): The data revealed that AE of wheat was highest in recommended NP fertilizer treated plot but the lowest in N omitted plots followed by P omitted plots. Thus if single and double nutrients are to be applied, it should be N and P in the study area.
Economic analysis: The economics analysis showed that under different nutrient omission treatments cost of cultivation was highest (23966.40 ETB ha-1) in fully fertilized (+NPKSZnB) treated plots and least (13531.62 ETB ha-1) in N omitted (-N) plots. No nutrient omission plots have incurred (3531.62 ETB ha-1) or 17.28% higher cost of cultivation compared with plots received only recommended NP fertilizers. The lowest (1.09) and highest (3.75) benefit to cost ratio were recorded due to omission of N and application of recommended NP fertilized plots.
4. Conclusion
From the present result we can conclude that N and P nutrients are the most important yield limiting nutrients in the study area where the inherent N and P supplying capacity of soil is too low and highly limits grain yield of wheat. Use of optimum dose of nitrogen and phosphorus should be used for efficient nutrient uptake which ultimately increases overall productivity. Therefore, rational fertilizer promotions and recommendations based on actual limiting nutrients for a given crop is not only revealed to supply adequate plant nutrients but also helped to understand the long-term ecological and economic benefits of the studied crop. Therefore, the use of an optimum dose of N and P should take great attention to efficient nutrient uptake, which ultimately increases wheat productivity.
Apart from these, imbalanced fertilization increases cost of production because any amount more than required does not help in producing higher crop yields. Thus, the consumption of more than required quantity of elements is called luxury consumption, which is nothing but a waste. This type of loss is in addition to leaching, washing and other losses of elements.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are availa ble from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] CIMMYT Economics Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. 1988. from agronomic data to farmer recommendations: an economics training manual (No. 27). CIMMYT.
[2] EthioSIS (Ethiopian Soils Information System). (2013). Status of soil resources in Ethiopia and priorities for sustainable management, GSP for eastern and southern Africa Nairobi, Kenya March 25-27.
[3] Fageria, N. K. Morais, O. P, and Santos A. B. 2010. Nitrogen use efficiency in upland rice genotypes. International Journal of Plant Nutrition. 33(6): 1696-1711.
[4] Getinet H., Selassie Y. G. and Balemi T. 2022. Yield Response and Nutrient use Efficiencies of Maize (Zea mays L.) As Determined through Nutrient Omission trials in Jimma Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 7(1), pp. 30-42.
[5] Gomez KA and Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. London, UK, (2nd Ed.).
[6] Hussain A, Kumar D and Gangaiah B. 2019. Growth, yield and quality of BT cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as affected by nutrient omission in irrigated cottonwheat cropping systems. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 33(1): 86-92.
[7] Islam SMM, Gaihre YK, Shah AL, Singh U, Sarkar MIU, Sattar MA. and Biswas JC. 2016. Rice yields and nitrogen use efficiency with different fertilizers and water management under intensive lowland rice cropping systems in Bangladesh. Nutr. Cycl. Agro ecosystem. 106(2): 143-156.
[8] Kamrunnahar M, Shahrear A, MosudIqbal, Mahmuda A and Aminul I. 2017. Effects of some major plant nutrients on growth and yield of wet season rice. Journal of Scientific Achievements 2(4) 5-15.
[9] Regmi A. P., Ladha J. K., Pathak H., Pashuquin H. E., Bueno C., Dawe D., Hobbs P. R., Joshy D., Maskey S. L., Pandey S. P. 2002. Yield and soil fertility trends in a 20-year rice-ricewheat experiment in Nepal, Soil Science Society of American Journal., 66, 857-867.
[10] Rufty T. W., Huber H. C., Volk R. J. 1988. Alterations in leaf carbohydrate metabolism in response to nitrogen stress, Plant Physiology, 88, 725-730.
[11] SAS (Statistical Analysis System) Institute. 2012. SAS/AF® 9.3: Procedure guide, 2nd edition: Cary, NC: USA.
[12] Wondwosen Tena and Beyene Sheleme. 2011. Identification of growth limiting nutrient (s) in Alfisols: Soil physico-chemical properties, nutrient concentrations and biomass yield of maize. American Journal of plant nutrition and fertilization technology. 1(1), pp. 23-35.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Getinet, H., Abera, K., Lulie, B. (2024). Identifying Limiting Nutrients for Wheat Production Through Omission Plot Experiment on Nitisols of East Gojjam Zone, North Western Ethiopia. American Journal of Applied Scientific Research, 10(3), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20241003.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Getinet, H.; Abera, K.; Lulie, B. Identifying Limiting Nutrients for Wheat Production Through Omission Plot Experiment on Nitisols of East Gojjam Zone, North Western Ethiopia. Am. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2024, 10(3), 49-56. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20241003.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Getinet H, Abera K, Lulie B. Identifying Limiting Nutrients for Wheat Production Through Omission Plot Experiment on Nitisols of East Gojjam Zone, North Western Ethiopia. Am J Appl Sci Res. 2024;10(3):49-56. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20241003.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajasr.20241003.12,
      author = {Habetamu Getinet and Kasaye Abera and Belsti Lulie},
      title = {Identifying Limiting Nutrients for Wheat Production Through Omission Plot Experiment on Nitisols of East Gojjam Zone, North Western Ethiopia
    },
      journal = {American Journal of Applied Scientific Research},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {49-56},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajasr.20241003.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20241003.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajasr.20241003.12},
      abstract = {A field experiment was conducted to identify the most yield limiting nutrients for wheat yield on Nitisols of D/Eliase District North western Ethiopia during 2021/22 main cropping season. The experiments were laid out in a completely randomized block design (RCBD) each with three replications. The treatments were control, NP, PKSZnB (-N), NKSZnB (-P), NPSZnB (-K), NPKZnB (-S), NPKSZn (-B), NPKSB (-Zn) and full fertilization (+NPKSZnB). The available data were collected and subjected to ANOVA using SAS 9.3 software. The LSD test was used to separate means at 5% level of significance. According to the results obtained, considerable reduced in plant height, spike length, grain and biomass yield was recorded due to omission of N and P nutrients compared with fully fertilized plots. The highest yield reduction was recorded due to omission of N followed by P in the study district. The highest grain yield of wheat (2835.20kgha-1) was measured from recommended NP fertilized plots while the lowest grain yields (357.50kgha-1 and 545.90kgha-1) were obtained from the control and N omitted plots respectively. Therefore, N and P were found to be the most yield limiting nutrients for wheat production indicating that the inherent N and P supplying capacity of soil is very low. Thus, N and P nutrients should be applied in optimum dose for efficient nutrient uptake which ultimately increases wheat productivity. The highest agronomic efficiency (19.08 kg grain/kg nutrient applied) was recorded from plots treated with recommended NP fertilizer. In addition the highest profits realized with application of recommended NP fertilizer compared with other treatments The economics of wheat cultivation therefore indicates that omission of (-N) and (-P) nutrients results in losses. Omission of nitrogen (-N) followed by omission of phosphorus (-P) has more impact on wheat yield and profits in the study area.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Identifying Limiting Nutrients for Wheat Production Through Omission Plot Experiment on Nitisols of East Gojjam Zone, North Western Ethiopia
    
    AU  - Habetamu Getinet
    AU  - Kasaye Abera
    AU  - Belsti Lulie
    Y1  - 2024/09/11
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20241003.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajasr.20241003.12
    T2  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
    JF  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
    JO  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
    SP  - 49
    EP  - 56
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2471-9730
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20241003.12
    AB  - A field experiment was conducted to identify the most yield limiting nutrients for wheat yield on Nitisols of D/Eliase District North western Ethiopia during 2021/22 main cropping season. The experiments were laid out in a completely randomized block design (RCBD) each with three replications. The treatments were control, NP, PKSZnB (-N), NKSZnB (-P), NPSZnB (-K), NPKZnB (-S), NPKSZn (-B), NPKSB (-Zn) and full fertilization (+NPKSZnB). The available data were collected and subjected to ANOVA using SAS 9.3 software. The LSD test was used to separate means at 5% level of significance. According to the results obtained, considerable reduced in plant height, spike length, grain and biomass yield was recorded due to omission of N and P nutrients compared with fully fertilized plots. The highest yield reduction was recorded due to omission of N followed by P in the study district. The highest grain yield of wheat (2835.20kgha-1) was measured from recommended NP fertilized plots while the lowest grain yields (357.50kgha-1 and 545.90kgha-1) were obtained from the control and N omitted plots respectively. Therefore, N and P were found to be the most yield limiting nutrients for wheat production indicating that the inherent N and P supplying capacity of soil is very low. Thus, N and P nutrients should be applied in optimum dose for efficient nutrient uptake which ultimately increases wheat productivity. The highest agronomic efficiency (19.08 kg grain/kg nutrient applied) was recorded from plots treated with recommended NP fertilizer. In addition the highest profits realized with application of recommended NP fertilizer compared with other treatments The economics of wheat cultivation therefore indicates that omission of (-N) and (-P) nutrients results in losses. Omission of nitrogen (-N) followed by omission of phosphorus (-P) has more impact on wheat yield and profits in the study area.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Debre Markos Agricultural Research Center, Debre Markos, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Debre Markos Agricultural Research Center, Debre Markos, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Debre Markos Agricultural Research Center, Debre Markos, Ethiopia